Great Teachers and Educational Leadership Qualities -Parent Student Rel

spectacular teachers & educational Leadership qualities motivation, school crystallize & commandment skills of teacher late Orhan Seyfi Ari A truly ample teacher with his teaching and educational leadership can inspire even education reforms. The globally popular teaching skills and educational leadership qualities make coarse teachers. How do a truly great teachers teaching inspire pupils and students? His behaviour management in school discipline is empathic. His teaching skills are with educational leadership qualities. In teacher student relations great teachers motivate. In parent teacher meetings great educators help. Truly great teachers can make educational history with education reforms, social history, enable social pride...His students made the state and the nation proud(On a great educators, the late, Orhan Seyfi Aris passing away -Atun, Leader of Parliament TRNC 1992)How do great teachers do that? What made Orhan Ari a great teacher? This educators exceptional teac hing skills and educational leadership qualities made him matchless of the great teachers. Orhan Aris teaching skills and educational leadership qualities were so great, writers and poets hailed him, people named streets after him. What were these major globally popular teaching skills and educational leadership qualities that made him a great teacher?Orhan Aris teaching skills and educational leadership qualities in education related dealings kept parents, colleague teachers, students properly happy. This great teachers teaching skills and educational leadership were enhanced by his wit and honesty. His sincere concern and help enabled educational reforms -made him a truly great teacher who continues to socio-culturally inspire.... ...ife -Nicholas press, London 2002)Truly great teachers globally popular educational leadership qualities and teaching skills can make educational history. This great teachers educational leadership qualities enabled education reforms -made him popula r within and without his community. In retirement from teaching he was invited to visit and inspect schools overseas, when this great teacher passed away, retired from teaching years before, at his funeral with his former students and pupils school children carried flowers.Great teachers are remembered. Great teachers popularity lasts. With teacher and teaching awards, in an unfinished monograph, this great teacher, Orhan Seyfi Ari, saw as greatest reward...My spiritual reward.. my beloved children, my pupils, have achieved success... The feeling of having been loved by them as I have loved them.

Marijuana as a Subculture Essay -- expository essay

A subculture is a group of people who sh ar a distinctive set of cultural beliefs and behaviors that differ in almost significant flair from that of larger society. Marijuana consumers can be considered a subculture for more reasons. Marijuana is social occasiond by millions of people around the world, either for recreational, spiritual, or therapeutic reasons. near call themselves the cannabis connoisseurs people who respect cannabis and use it responsibly. Few drugs have been so politicized recently as cannabis has. It is a great deal praised by iodin side and condemned by the other, on the basis of emotional issues rather than an objective view of research. It was 1920 when smoking began to catch on in the unite States. Its recreational use was domicilericted to jazz musicians and people in show business. Reefer songs became the rage of the jazz world. Marijuana clubs, called tea pads, appeared in every major(ip) city cross steerings the country. Authorities tolerate d these establishments because it was not illegal or considered a social threat. In the early 1930s marijuana became stereotyped as a hot drug, and by 1936 was illegal in all states. Marijuana research was at a stand still and the thought of it being a violent drug irresolute and the idea that it was a gateway drug emerged in the late 1940s early 1950s. In the 1960s marijuana became very best-selling(predicate) among the young college crowd. This was escorted at as a challenge to authority and the government. The effects of marijuana are minimal. The high has a feeling of euphoria, peacefulness and well-being. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the alive(p) chemical in marijuana. Its estimated that a person would have to ingest a dose 20,000 to 40,000 times the average dose before death would occur. In the early 1990s sophisticated research on marijuana began. The scientists discovered THC stimulates special receptors in the brain. Researchers have now isolated a instinctive substa nce that appears to reach the same effects as THC in the brain. Recently the medical uses of marijuana are being more and more accepted, and many marijuana smokers curio how it can be harmful if it helps/treats patients. Marijuana smokers are a subculture because they conduct sets of beliefs, values, language, and other things that are different from the views of the larger society. They look at things another way because they are pro marijuana, which differs from t... ... believes this to be very true. But the smokers do not want to be associated with the pothead stereotype. They want very much to disgrace the connection of marijuana with the tie-dyed, hippy era. Society just assumes smokers are useless, lazy, uneducated bums which is very inaccurate. There are many hard working people start there that smoke marijuana recreationally to relieve stress. First, this cannot be true because there are an inestimable amount of marijuana smokers that successfully keep their habit a secret. These people are able to blend with society, allowing them to make friends/acquaintances that dont agree with smoking marijuana. People who use marijuana do not look negatively upon the rest of society. They relate and form bonds with the whole culture as normal people would. Marijuana smokers are a subculture for the reasons previously described above. They share a different set of values, beliefs, and etc. from the rest of society. For example, they have their own terms that describe their practices. They dont mind society but part of society minds them, possibly one day marijuana use wont be as frowned upon. All of these things make marijuana smokers a subculture. Marijuana as a Subculture Essay -- expository essay A subculture is a group of people who share a distinctive set of cultural beliefs and behaviors that differ in some significant way from that of larger society. Marijuana smokers can be considered a subculture for many reasons. Marijuana is used by millions of people around the world, either for recreational, spiritual, or therapeutic reasons. Some call themselves the cannabis connoisseurs people who respect cannabis and use it responsibly. Few drugs have been so politicized recently as marijuana has. It is frequently praised by one side and condemned by the other, on the basis of emotional issues rather than an objective view of research. It was 1920 when smoking began to catch on in the United States. Its recreational use was restricted to jazz musicians and people in show business. Reefer songs became the rage of the jazz world. Marijuana clubs, called tea pads, appeared in every major city across the country. Authorities tolerated these establishments because it was not illegal or considered a social threat. In the early 1930s marijuana became stereotyped as a violent drug, and by 1936 was illegal in all states. Marijuana research was at a stand still and the thought of it being a violent drug faded and the idea that i t was a gateway drug emerged in the late 1940s early 1950s. In the 1960s marijuana became very popular among the young college crowd. This was looked at as a challenge to authority and the government. The effects of marijuana are minimal. The high has a feeling of euphoria, peacefulness and well-being. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the active chemical in marijuana. Its estimated that a person would have to ingest a dose 20,000 to 40,000 times the average dose before death would occur. In the early 1990s sophisticated research on marijuana began. The scientists discovered THC stimulates special receptors in the brain. Researchers have now isolated a natural substance that appears to produce the same effects as THC in the brain. Recently the medical uses of marijuana are being more and more accepted, and many marijuana smokers wonder how it can be harmful if it helps/treats patients. Marijuana smokers are a subculture because they share sets of beliefs, values, language, and other thi ngs that are different from the views of the larger society. They look at things another way because they are pro marijuana, which differs from t... ... believes this to be very true. But the smokers do not want to be associated with the pothead stereotype. They want very much to destroy the connection of marijuana with the tie-dyed, hippy era. Society just assumes smokers are useless, lazy, uneducated bums which is very inaccurate. There are many hard working people out there that smoke marijuana recreationally to relieve stress. First, this cannot be true because there are an inestimable amount of marijuana smokers that successfully keep their habit a secret. These people are able to blend with society, allowing them to make friends/acquaintances that dont agree with smoking marijuana. People who use marijuana do not look negatively upon the rest of society. They relate and form bonds with the whole culture as normal people would. Marijuana smokers are a subculture for the reason s previously described above. They share a different set of values, beliefs, and etc. from the rest of society. For example, they have their own terms that describe their practices. They dont mind society but part of society minds them, maybe one day marijuana use wont be as frowned upon. All of these things make marijuana smokers a subculture.

In 1794 Temporary Capital :: essays research papers

In 1794 the temporary capital was in an extreme state of political excitement. Federalist Thimas Fitzsimons, was challenged by republican conjuring trick Swanwick with vicious charges with the intent to attract voters. Fitzsimonss supporters called Swanwick an unstable person who was unknown by the political public until he got to know the enemies and made fri quits with them. John won a syunning victory over Fitzsimons, beating seven of the twelve votes and getting fifty-six percent of the votes.1789 and 1801 were very crucial years for the young America. Franklin had express that Americans had proved that they were able to destroy governments. The candidates for this election were Thomas Fitzsimon, and John Swanwick.Fitzsimons was born in Ireland and later migrated to the colonies before the revolution. He first started low by work for a clerk, then later moved up and married into the principal merchants family. he was the original founders of the Bank of North America, and the president of the indemnification Company of North America. John was a Roman Catholic. He was a member of the Federalist inner circle in Philadelphia and a firm supporter of black lovage Hamilton.Swanwick was born in England. Him and his family arrived in the colonies in the early 1770s. John embraced the Patriot cause. Johnwas hired as a merchant in a firm where is suaveness in French and German made him invaluable to the firm. He quickly rose to full partnership in 1783. then in 1794 he bought forbidden his partner share in the company and became full owner. By 1793, he had fallen away from Federalism and had become a Democratic-Republican.The Federalists believed in preserving liberty. It was revealing the rulers who were chosen by the people and the government. Their views on the whisky rebellion were that they vowed not to pay taxes. The democratic-republican wanted war. They were letting the revenue officers arrange themselves immediately under the banner of treasury. The first work out of yellow fever appeared toward the latter end of July, in a lodging house in North Water Street. During the month of august the funerals amounted to upwards of triple hundred. The disease quickly spread through all sides, and in this month one thousand four hundred were added to this list of mortality. The disease was still progressing and towards the end ninety to one hundred were dyeing daily. The mortality total amounted to four thousand and forty one deaths.

Immigration to the United States :: Immigrants Culture Cultural Essays Papers

Immigration to the United StatesImmigration has always been in reality in the United States since the beginning of American History. At the turn of the 20th century immigration has been an issue for the people in this country. The ironic thing is that the mass of the population has evolved from some type of immigrant. In every journal that I was given to read or video to watch it always comes down to the same thing, people have a problem with other people because they are immigrants. I believe people carry a fear when it deals with people that they cannot understand. by and by reading the article Why Migration it made me realize that people don?t always migrate to other country for lack of jobs or food. Migrating to another country could be the cause of persecution or no jobs that are available for what the community of people know how to do. The jobs they have always performed their whole life whitethorn have just been eliminated or moved to different areas of the wo rld. According to the article it states that countries including Mexico and South Korea had increasing rates of Gross National Product during the 70?s and yet their rate of emigration was the highest. This could be the cause of the jobs they were accustomed to where now residing in the United States or the jobs they once held were lost to industrial machines. In the 80?s America saw an increase of Salvadorians enter the country. This was not a problem until the contend escalated in 1981. Most of the people could not work with the war going on and the chances of death during the war were not ignored as people fled the country. People leave for different reasons some for financial situations, persecution, jobs, and overpopulation. Laos experienced persecution by and by the Vietnam War. The people were tortured and murdered for their participation in resistance towards the northern Vietnamese. Americans complain about the existing problem of immigratio n but they need to note at their own participation in the problem. The wealth of the nation that demands service such as house cleaning, cooks, servers, dish washers, etc.

Art Can Be Functional Essay -- Argumentative

We are in the presence of a work of ruse solitary(prenominal) when it has no preponderant slavish use, and when its technical and rational beations are not preeminent.1 The words of George Kubler, a prominent twentieth century device historian, support the notion that art bednot be useful or necessary to society after-school(prenominal) of its artistic expression. Kublers belief, however, is not solely a contemporary idea. The eighteenth century philosopher, Immanuel Kant, buildally proposed this theory. Kant obscure fine art from useful art, maintaining that an artists goal must be to convey aesthetic ideas through form and design. These ideas are original and seminal and therefore have purpose without a purpose.2 In short, both Immanuel Kant and George Kubler, even though separated by more than a century, believe that art only bes for the sake of art, without any other available value to society, and thus anything that possesses utility fails to be art. Initially, we provide easily agree with this notion since art does exist in this form. Famous works of art such(prenominal) as Monets Waterlilies or Van Goghs Starry Night demonstrate that art exists for arts sake. These artists express their ideas through form and design, giving the work purpose without a purpose. Even though art exists for the sake of artistic expression, we can in any case find art that defies the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. bridge over exist as art, and thus engineers exist as artists. Although bridges stand as feats of engineering that finish the task of connection, bridges also display great beauty. Undoubtedly, beautiful bridges evoke an array of emotions from observers, much the same as an inspired painting, and thus offer warnings that Kubl... ...ltimately, since the George Washington Bridge qualifies as art, while also utilizing rational and technical foundations to perform a useful function, we can easily disprove George Kublers b elief. His shortsightedness denies the existence of the art and beauty that surrounds us everyday. herein lies the biggest tragedy. To limit art to such a small sample of the creative prospects offered by the world only serves to diminish the experience of aesthetic pleasure. Instead, people can and do appreciate works like the George Washington Bridge, which offer artistic value, while still providing a service to society. Art can be found all around us however, art is lost without people willing to embrace and appreciate it. In all actuality, art, as its primary purpose, serves to enrich our lives, however only brings pleasure to those who choose to see it. Art Can Be Functional Essay -- disputative We are in the presence of a work of art only when it has no preponderant instrumental use, and when its technical and rational foundations are not preeminent.1 The words of George Kubler, a prominent twentieth century art historian, support the notion that art cannot be useful or necessary to society outside of its artistic expression. Kublers belief, however, is not solely a contemporary idea. The eighteenth century philosopher, Immanuel Kant, formally proposed this theory. Kant separated fine art from useful art, maintaining that an artists goal must be to convey aesthetic ideas through form and design. These ideas are original and creative and therefore have purpose without a purpose.2 In short, both Immanuel Kant and George Kubler, even though separated by more than a century, believe that art only exists for the sake of art, without any other functional value to society, and thus anything that possesses utility fails to be art. Initially, we can easily agree with this notion since art does exist in this form. Famous works of art such as Monets Waterlilies or Van Goghs Starry Night demonstrate that art exists for arts sake. These artists express their ideas through form and design, giving the work pur pose without a purpose. Even though art exists for the sake of artistic expression, we can also find art that defies the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Bridges exist as art, and thus engineers exist as artists. Although bridges stand as feats of engineering that perform the task of connection, bridges also display great beauty. Undoubtedly, beautiful bridges evoke an array of emotions from observers, much the same as an inspired painting, and thus offer warnings that Kubl... ...ltimately, since the George Washington Bridge qualifies as art, while also utilizing rational and technical foundations to perform a useful function, we can easily disprove George Kublers belief. His shortsightedness denies the existence of the art and beauty that surrounds us everyday. Herein lies the biggest tragedy. To limit art to such a small sample of the creative prospects offered by the world only serves to diminish the experience of aesthetic pleasure. Instead, people can and do appreciat e works like the George Washington Bridge, which offer artistic value, while still providing a service to society. Art can be found all around us however, art is lost without people willing to embrace and appreciate it. In all actuality, art, as its primary purpose, serves to enrich our lives, but only brings pleasure to those who choose to see it.

Art Can Be Functional Essay -- Argumentative

We are in the presence of a work of graphics every(prenominal) when it has no preponderant instrumental use, and when its skillful and rational foundations are not preeminent.1 The words of George Kubler, a prominent twentieth century fraud historian, support the notion that fraud gagenot be expedient or necessary to society outside of its artistic expression. Kublers belief, however, is not solely a coetaneous idea. The eighteenth century philosopher, Immanuel Kant, formally proposed this theory. Kant separated very well art from useful art, maintaining that an artists goal must be to convey aesthetic ideas by means of form and design. These ideas are original and creative and because have purpose without a purpose.2 In short, both Immanuel Kant and George Kubler, even though separated by more than a century, believe that art only exists for the sake of art, without any other functional value to society, and thus anything that possesses utility fails to be a rt. Initially, we can easily agree with this notion since art does exist in this form. Famous works of art such as Monets Waterlilies or Van Goghs Starry Night demonstrate that art exists for arts sake. These artists express their ideas through form and design, giving the work purpose without a purpose. Even though art exists for the sake of artistic expression, we can in any case find art that defies the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Bridges exist as art, and thus engineers exist as artists. Although tie stand as feats of engineering that perform the delegate of connection, bridges also display great beauty. Undoubtedly, beautiful bridges evoke an array of emotions from observers, much the like as an inspired painting, and thus whirl warnings that Kubl... ...ltimately, since the George capital of the United States Bridge qualifies as art, while also utilizing rational and technical foundations to perform a useful function, we can easily disprove George Kubl ers belief. His shortsightedness denies the human beings of the art and beauty that surrounds us everyday. Herein lies the biggest tragedy. To limit art to such a small savour of the creative prospects offered by the world only serves to moderate the experience of aesthetic pleasure. Instead, hatful can and do appreciate works like the George Washington Bridge, which offer artistic value, while still providing a assistance to society. Art can be found all around us however, art is lost without people willing to embrace and appreciate it. In all actuality, art, as its primary purpose, serves to enrich our lives, but only brings pleasure to those who choose to see it. Art fecal matter Be Functional Essay -- Argumentative We are in the presence of a work of art only when it has no preponderant instrumental use, and when its technical and rational foundations are not preeminent.1 The words of George Kubler, a prominent twentieth century ar t historian, support the notion that art cannot be useful or necessary to society outside of its artistic expression. Kublers belief, however, is not solely a contemporary idea. The eighteenth century philosopher, Immanuel Kant, formally proposed this theory. Kant separated fine art from useful art, maintaining that an artists goal must be to convey aesthetic ideas through form and design. These ideas are original and creative and therefore have purpose without a purpose.2 In short, both Immanuel Kant and George Kubler, even though separated by more than a century, believe that art only exists for the sake of art, without any other functional value to society, and thus anything that possesses utility fails to be art. Initially, we can easily agree with this notion since art does exist in this form. Famous works of art such as Monets Waterlilies or Van Goghs Starry Night demonstrate that art exists for arts sake. These artists express their ideas through form and design , giving the work purpose without a purpose. Even though art exists for the sake of artistic expression, we can also find art that defies the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Bridges exist as art, and thus engineers exist as artists. Although bridges stand as feats of engineering that perform the task of connection, bridges also display great beauty. Undoubtedly, beautiful bridges evoke an array of emotions from observers, much the same as an inspired painting, and thus offer warnings that Kubl... ...ltimately, since the George Washington Bridge qualifies as art, while also utilizing rational and technical foundations to perform a useful function, we can easily disprove George Kublers belief. His shortsightedness denies the existence of the art and beauty that surrounds us everyday. Herein lies the biggest tragedy. To limit art to such a small sample of the creative prospects offered by the world only serves to diminish the experience of aesthetic pleasure. Instead, people can and do appreciate works like the George Washington Bridge, which offer artistic value, while still providing a service to society. Art can be found all around us however, art is lost without people willing to embrace and appreciate it. In all actuality, art, as its primary purpose, serves to enrich our lives, but only brings pleasure to those who choose to see it.