Art Can Be Functional Essay -- Argumentative

We are in the presence of a work of graphics every(prenominal) when it has no preponderant instrumental use, and when its skillful and rational foundations are not preeminent.1 The words of George Kubler, a prominent twentieth century fraud historian, support the notion that fraud gagenot be expedient or necessary to society outside of its artistic expression. Kublers belief, however, is not solely a coetaneous idea. The eighteenth century philosopher, Immanuel Kant, formally proposed this theory. Kant separated very well art from useful art, maintaining that an artists goal must be to convey aesthetic ideas by means of form and design. These ideas are original and creative and because have purpose without a purpose.2 In short, both Immanuel Kant and George Kubler, even though separated by more than a century, believe that art only exists for the sake of art, without any other functional value to society, and thus anything that possesses utility fails to be a rt. Initially, we can easily agree with this notion since art does exist in this form. Famous works of art such as Monets Waterlilies or Van Goghs Starry Night demonstrate that art exists for arts sake. These artists express their ideas through form and design, giving the work purpose without a purpose. Even though art exists for the sake of artistic expression, we can in any case find art that defies the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Bridges exist as art, and thus engineers exist as artists. Although tie stand as feats of engineering that perform the delegate of connection, bridges also display great beauty. Undoubtedly, beautiful bridges evoke an array of emotions from observers, much the like as an inspired painting, and thus whirl warnings that Kubl... ...ltimately, since the George capital of the United States Bridge qualifies as art, while also utilizing rational and technical foundations to perform a useful function, we can easily disprove George Kubl ers belief. His shortsightedness denies the human beings of the art and beauty that surrounds us everyday. Herein lies the biggest tragedy. To limit art to such a small savour of the creative prospects offered by the world only serves to moderate the experience of aesthetic pleasure. Instead, hatful can and do appreciate works like the George Washington Bridge, which offer artistic value, while still providing a assistance to society. Art can be found all around us however, art is lost without people willing to embrace and appreciate it. In all actuality, art, as its primary purpose, serves to enrich our lives, but only brings pleasure to those who choose to see it. Art fecal matter Be Functional Essay -- Argumentative We are in the presence of a work of art only when it has no preponderant instrumental use, and when its technical and rational foundations are not preeminent.1 The words of George Kubler, a prominent twentieth century ar t historian, support the notion that art cannot be useful or necessary to society outside of its artistic expression. Kublers belief, however, is not solely a contemporary idea. The eighteenth century philosopher, Immanuel Kant, formally proposed this theory. Kant separated fine art from useful art, maintaining that an artists goal must be to convey aesthetic ideas through form and design. These ideas are original and creative and therefore have purpose without a purpose.2 In short, both Immanuel Kant and George Kubler, even though separated by more than a century, believe that art only exists for the sake of art, without any other functional value to society, and thus anything that possesses utility fails to be art. Initially, we can easily agree with this notion since art does exist in this form. Famous works of art such as Monets Waterlilies or Van Goghs Starry Night demonstrate that art exists for arts sake. These artists express their ideas through form and design , giving the work purpose without a purpose. Even though art exists for the sake of artistic expression, we can also find art that defies the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Bridges exist as art, and thus engineers exist as artists. Although bridges stand as feats of engineering that perform the task of connection, bridges also display great beauty. Undoubtedly, beautiful bridges evoke an array of emotions from observers, much the same as an inspired painting, and thus offer warnings that Kubl... ...ltimately, since the George Washington Bridge qualifies as art, while also utilizing rational and technical foundations to perform a useful function, we can easily disprove George Kublers belief. His shortsightedness denies the existence of the art and beauty that surrounds us everyday. Herein lies the biggest tragedy. To limit art to such a small sample of the creative prospects offered by the world only serves to diminish the experience of aesthetic pleasure. Instead, people can and do appreciate works like the George Washington Bridge, which offer artistic value, while still providing a service to society. Art can be found all around us however, art is lost without people willing to embrace and appreciate it. In all actuality, art, as its primary purpose, serves to enrich our lives, but only brings pleasure to those who choose to see it.